Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

NO1 [K2A1]

Y-DNA Haplogroup NO1 [K2A1]

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig NO1 [K2A1]

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup NO1 [K2A1] represents an early ancestral stage within the broader NO branch of K2, near the phylogenetic divergence that ultimately produced haplogroups N and O. Because this lineage is defined at a deep branching point, it is best understood as an important intermediate node rather than a widely sampled modern population marker.

Its most plausible origin lies in North Eurasia during the Late Paleolithic, roughly 45 thousand years ago, when ancestral populations were distributed across northern parts of Eurasia and were beginning to diversify into lineages that later expanded in very different directions. The split leading to N and O is one of the key events in the paternal prehistory of Eurasia, linking northern Eurasian ancestry with later demographic expansions into Siberia, East Asia, and Southeast Asia.

Subclades

As an ancestral intermediate lineage, NO1 [K2A1] is primarily significant because it sits immediately upstream of the clade that led to haplogroups N and O. In practical terms, this means its best-known descendants are not usually treated as direct modern subclades of the same name, but rather as the major downstream branches that emerged from the broader NO trunk.

  • Haplogroup N: a major paternal lineage strongly associated with northern Eurasia, Siberia, and later Uralic-speaking populations.
  • Haplogroup O: a major East and Southeast Asian paternal lineage that became widespread through later prehistoric population expansions.

Because NO1 is deep in the tree and likely rare or extinct as a distinct surviving lineage, its phylogenetic importance is mainly reconstructive: it helps place the common ancestor of N and O in space and time.

Geographical Distribution

Direct modern observations of NO1 [K2A1] are expected to be extremely rare, but lineages descending from the broader NO ancestry are widespread. The geographic signal therefore points to a north Eurasian source region followed by later expansions.

  • Northern Eurasia and Siberia: most relevant to early survival and diversification of ancestral NO lineages.
  • East Asia: important through the later spread of descendant haplogroup O.
  • Southeast Asia: significant due to the high frequencies achieved by O in many populations.
  • Uralic-associated regions: relevant through descendant haplogroup N and its later dispersals across the north.

Historical and Cultural Significance

From a population genetics perspective, NO1 is significant because it marks a deep branch in the paternal tree that connects two of the most successful Eurasian haplogroup expansions. The downstream history of the NO clade is tied to broad processes such as post-glacial recolonization, hunter-gatherer mobility, steppe and forest-zone interactions, and later farming and language expansions across Eurasia.

Although NO1 itself is not strongly tied to a specific archaeological culture due to its very early age and limited direct ancient DNA evidence, the descendant branches are often discussed in relation to:

  • Ancient Siberian hunter-gatherers and forest-zone foragers
  • Neolithic and Bronze Age population movements in northern Eurasia
  • Uralic-associated expansions linked to haplogroup N
  • East Asian Neolithic and later prehistoric dispersals linked to haplogroup O

The lineage is therefore most useful as a phylogenetic anchor for interpreting how paternal diversity in Eurasia separated into northern and eastern trajectories.

Conclusion

Y-DNA haplogroup NO1 [K2A1] is an ancient intermediary lineage that sits close to the ancestral split leading to N and O, two of the most geographically extensive paternal haplogroups in Eurasia. Its importance lies less in modern frequency and more in its role as a key marker for reconstructing the deep paternal prehistory of North Eurasia and the subsequent dispersal of descendant lineages across the continent.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis NO1 [K2A1]. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 NO1 [K2A1] Aktuell ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 0 0 0
2 NO1 [K2A1 ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 0 0
3 NO1 [K2A ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 0 0
4 NO1 [K2 ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 0 0
5 NO1 [K ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 0 0
6 NO1 [ ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 0 0
7 NO1 ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 41 0
8 NO ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 4 801 12

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

North Eurasia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup NO1 haplogroup NO1 is found include:

  1. Ancient northern Eurasian populations carrying ancestral NO-related lineages
  2. Siberian populations, especially those associated with downstream haplogroup N diversity
  3. East Asian populations, especially through the later expansion of haplogroup O
  4. Southeast Asian populations where haplogroup O reached high frequencies
  5. Uralic-associated populations in northern Eurasia through descendant N lineages

Regionale Präsenz

East Asia High
Southeast Asia Moderate
Central Asia Low
Siberia & Northern Asia Moderate
South Asia Low
Northern Europe Low
Southeast Asia Low
Northeastern Europe Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~50k Jahre zurück

    Jungpaläolithikum

    Fortgeschrittene Werkzeuge, Kunst und kulturelle Vielfalt

  2. ~45k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe NO1 [K2A1]

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~20k Jahre zurück

    Letztes glaziales Maximum

    Höhepunkt der letzten Eiszeit, isolierte Bevölkerungen

  4. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  5. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  6. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  7. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  8. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig NO1 [K2A1]

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu NO1 [K2A1]. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Avar Culture Delphic Late Neolithic Chinese Lena River Culture Piliny-Kyjatice Russia_AltaiKrai_N Saxon Schleswig Taiwanese Iron Thai Bronze Age Thai Iron Age West Liao River Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.